<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki-spirit.win/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Harinnzqae</id>
	<title>Wiki Spirit - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki-spirit.win/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Harinnzqae"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki-spirit.win/index.php/Special:Contributions/Harinnzqae"/>
	<updated>2026-05-27T07:00:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki-spirit.win/index.php?title=Why_Global_Forums_Know_Client_Checklist_for_Event_Agencies_in_Penang_on_AI_Trust_Events&amp;diff=2123842</id>
		<title>Why Global Forums Know Client Checklist for Event Agencies in Penang on AI Trust Events</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki-spirit.win/index.php?title=Why_Global_Forums_Know_Client_Checklist_for_Event_Agencies_in_Penang_on_AI_Trust_Events&amp;diff=2123842"/>
		<updated>2026-05-26T02:00:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Harinnzqae: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; AI trust is not AI performance. An algorithm can have excellent performance metrics but still be untrustworthy. Bias, hallucination, lack of explainability, data privacy concerns, robustness failures, and security vulnerabilities. A responsible AI gathering is not an engineering meetup. It should handle supervision, values, legal requirements, verification, and user concerns.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt; &amp;lt;iframe  src=&amp;quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/FkD...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; AI trust is not AI performance. An algorithm can have excellent performance metrics but still be untrustworthy. Bias, hallucination, lack of explainability, data privacy concerns, robustness failures, and security vulnerabilities. A responsible AI gathering is not an engineering meetup. It should handle supervision, values, legal requirements, verification, and user concerns.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt; &amp;lt;iframe  src=&amp;quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/FkDsXPmbhNQ&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;560&amp;quot; height=&amp;quot;315&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;border: none;&amp;quot; allowfullscreen=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&amp;lt;/iframe&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Businesses providing requirements to coordinators on the island for AI trust events need a checklist. Let me give you the items to review.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;  Why Every AI Trust Event Must Address Fairness&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Some planners assume &amp;quot;trustworthy AI&amp;quot; means talking about ethics generally. Organizations demand examples of practical prejudice detection systems (equity analysis software, discrimination identification packages, bias exploration interfaces).&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt; &amp;lt;img  src=&amp;quot;https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4-RZRLdBpFc/hq720.jpg&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;max-width:500px;height:auto;&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&amp;lt;/img&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; A coordinator from Kollysphere agency shared: “A client inquired with a planner about addressing prejudice in their trustworthy AI gathering. The planner said &#039;we will have a session on ethical AI.&#039; The client asked &#039;which bias measurements? Demographic parity? Equal opportunity? Individual fairness?&#039; The planner could not answer. The client came to us. We delivered a real-time showcase revealing a model that displayed bias by postcode, then illustrated how to quantify and lessen it. The audience saw the unfairness. Then they saw the solution. That is an AI trust event.”&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Inquire with planners in Penang state: Which equity indicators will you present? Will you show a model that is actually biased, and then show how to fix it?&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;  Red Teaming and Adversarial Testing: Breaking the Model on Stage&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; All algorithms have weaknesses. An AI trust event that only shows successes is misleading.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt; &amp;lt;iframe  src=&amp;quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/87ziIN-4S84&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;560&amp;quot; height=&amp;quot;315&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;border: none;&amp;quot; allowfullscreen=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&amp;lt;/iframe&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Review with your planner: Will you demonstrate adversarial attacks (small perturbations that cause misclassification)? What defenses will you show against these attacks?&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; A responsible ML engineer from the island wrote: “I participated in a responsible AI summit where all the showcases performed flawlessly. The presenter stated &#039;our algorithm is resilient.&#039; I asked &#039;have you evaluated it against adversarial attacks?&#039; He responded &#039;we have confidence in our team.&#039; That is not a responsible AI summit. That is a promotional event. The following summit I joined, the speaker deliberately caused the model to fail during the presentation. She demonstrated how inserting a single pixel transformed a &#039;stop sign&#039; into a &#039;speed limit&#039; sign. Then she presented the protection method. I gained more knowledge in those five minutes than throughout the entire earlier event.”&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;  Why Trust Requires Transparency about Training Data&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; An algorithm trained on unrepresentative data creates discriminatory outcomes regardless of the algorithm.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Pose these questions to coordinators on the island: How does your gathering handle training data history and dataset transparency? Do you demonstrate tools for data auditing (Great Expectations, Deequ, Amundsen)?&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt;  &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;https://www.demilked.com/author/santoniipn/&amp;quot;&amp;gt;event management malaysia&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;  includes a live information quality check displaying how undetected imbalances in training content produce discriminatory systems.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;  The Difference between &amp;quot;AI Makes Decisions&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;AI Supports Human Decisions&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Some models remove people from the loop. Responsible AI supports human judgment.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Your planner in Penang state must cover people-in-the-loop architectures, human supervision methods, and manual verification procedures.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;  Why AI Trust Events Must Cover Model Failures&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p  class=&amp;quot;ds-markdown-paragraph&amp;quot; &amp;gt; All algorithms will eventually err. A trustworthy AI gathering that only handles harm reduction is insufficient.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/html&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Harinnzqae</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>